Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Healthc Qual Res ; 33(4): 213-218, 2018.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31610977

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The misuse and overuse of antimicrobials can contribute to an increase in antimicrobial resistance, increasing the risk of infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria. Most common surgical pathologies are infectious (either primary or as a complication), often being over-treated. Exploring the perception of surgeons on the use of implementing Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is relevant in order to adapt the program to local context. OBJECTIVE: To determine the perception of surgeons on the management of infections and antibiotic (AB) prescription in a General Surgery Department (GSD). METHODS: A cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted using an anonymous questionnaire that was distributed to assess the aspects related to AB management. RESULTS: A total of 42 questionnaires were completed, with a 65% response rate. The large majority (75%) considered that antimicrobial resistance was an important problem. The main situations considered with medium/high margin of improvement were: time from taking the specimen to receiving the results (70%), use of a wide spectrum AB, and excessive duration (88% and 89%), dose adjustment according to renal function (81%), unnecessary prolongation of intravenous AB treatment (87%) and excessive duration of it (89%), preference for intravenous AB administration until discharge of the patient (73%). There were also difficulties in ASP implementation, as well as established and solid AB patterns (84%) and the heterogeneity of the GSD (84%). CONCLUSIONS: Organisational aspects of the GSD constitute one of the problems to implement the ASPs. A specific multidisciplinary team has been constituted to address different training aspects. This will also serve as a forum of discussion of certain complex patients with difficulties in antibiotic management.

2.
Farm. hosp ; 38(2): 100-104, mar.-abr. 2014. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-125307

RESUMO

Objective: Web 2.0 tools are transforming the pathways health professionals use to communicate among themselves and with their patients so this situation forces a change of mind to implement them. The aim of our study is to assess the state of knowledge of the main Web 2.0 applications and how are used in a sample of hospital pharmacists. Method: The study was carried out through an anonymous survey to all members of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) by means of a questionnaire sent by the Google Drive® application. After the 3-month study period was completed, collected data were compiled and then analyzed using SPPS v15.0. Results: The response rate was 7.3%, being 70.5% female and 76.3% specialists. The majority of respondents (54.2%) were aged 20 to 35. Pubmed was the main way of accessing published articles. 65.2% of pharmacists knew the term "Web 2.0". 45.3% pharmacists were Twitter users and over 58.9% mainly for professional purposes. Most pharmacists believed that Twitter was a good tool to interact with professionals and patients. 78.7% do not use an agregator, but when used, Google Reader was the most common. Conclusion: Although Web 2.0 applications are gaining mains-tream popularity some health professionals may resist using them. In fact, more than a half of surveyed pharmacists referred a lack ofknowledge about Web 2.0 tools. It would be positive for pharmacists to use them properly during their professional practice to getthe best out of them


Objetivo: Las herramientas de la Web 2.0 están transformando los canales que los profesionales sanitarios emplean para comunicarse entre sí y con los pacientes por lo que esta situación obliga a un cambio de mentalidad para implementarlas. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el grado de conocimiento y aplicación de las principales herramientas Web 2.0 por parte de farmacéuticos hospitalarios. Método: El estudio se llevó a cabo mediante una encuesta anómina dirigida a todos los miembros de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH) a través de la aplicación Google Drive®. Después de completarse los 3 meses del período de estudio, los datos recogidos se analizaron usando SPPS v15.0. Resultados: La tasa de respuesta fue del 7,3%, siendo el 70,5%mujeres y el 76,3 % especialistas. La mayoría de los que respondieron(54,2%) estaban en el rango de edad de 20 a 35 años. Pubmed fue el medio principal de acceder a los artículos publicados. El 65,2% delos farmacéuticos conocía el término "Web 2.0". El 45,3% eran usuarios de Twitter, de los cuales un 58,9% principalmente para uso profesional. La mayoría creía que Twitter era una buena herramienta para interactuar entre los profesionales y los pacientes. El 78,7% no usaba un agregador, pero cuando lo hacían, Google Reader era el más habitual. Conclusión: Aunque las aplicaciones de la Web 2.0 están ganando popularidad, algunos profesionales sanitarios se resisten a utilizarlas. De hecho, más de la mitad de los farmacéuticos entrevistados manifestaba un nulo conocimiento de las herramientas de la Web 2.0. Sería positivo que los farmacéuticos las usasen adecuadamentedurante su práctica profesional para sacarles el máximo partido


Assuntos
Humanos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Atitude Frente aos Computadores , Internet , Webcasts como Assunto , Rede Social , Desenvolvimento Tecnológico
3.
Farm Hosp ; 38(2): 100-4, 2014 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24669893

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Web 2.0 tools are transforming the pathways health professionals use to communicate among themselves and with their patients so this situation forces a change of mind to implement them. The aim of our study is to assess the state of knowledge of the main Web 2.0 applications and how are used in a sample of hospital pharmacists. METHOD: The study was carried out through an anonymous survey to all members of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) by means of a questionnaire sent by the Google Drive® application. After the 3-month study period was completed, collected data were compiled and then analyzed using SPPS v15.0. RESULTS: The response rate was 7.3%, being 70.5% female and 76.3% specialists. The majority of respondents (54.2%) were aged 20 to 35. Pubmed was the main way of accessing published articles. 65.2% of pharmacists knew the term "Web 2.0". 45.3% pharmacists were Twitter users and over 58.9% mainly for professional purposes. Most pharmacists believed that Twitter was a good tool to interact with professionals and patients. 78.7% do not use an agregator, but when used, Google Reader was the most common. CONCLUSION: Although Web 2.0 applications are gaining mainstream popularity some health professionals may resist using them. In fact, more than a half of surveyed pharmacists referred a lack of knowledge about Web 2.0 tools. It would be positive for pharmacists to use them properly during their professional practice to get the best out of them.


Objetivo: Las herramientas de la Web 2.0 están transformando los canales que los profesionales sanitarios emplean para comunicarse entre sí y con los pacientes por lo que esta situación obliga a un cambio de mentalidad para implementarlas. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el grado de conocimiento y aplicación de las principales herramientas Web 2.0 por parte de farmacéuticos hospitalarios. Método: El estudio se llevó a cabo mediante una encuesta anómina dirigida a todos los miembros de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH) a través de la aplicación Google Drive®. Después de completarse los 3 meses del período de estudio, los datos recogidos se analizaron usando SPPS v15.0. Resultados: La tasa de respuesta fue del 7,3%, siendo el 70,5% mujeres y el 76,3 % especialistas. La mayoría de los que respondieron (54,2%) estaban en el rango de edad de 20 a 35 años. Pubmed fue el medio principal de acceder a los artículos publicados. El 65,2% de los farmacéuticos conocía el término "Web 2.0". El 45,3% eran usuarios de Twitter, de los cuales un 58,9% principalmente para uso profesional. La mayoría creía que Twitter era una buena herramienta para interactuar entre los profesionales y los pacientes. El 78,7% no usaba un agregador, pero cuando lo hacían, Google Reader era el más habitual. Conclusión: Aunque las aplicaciones de la Web 2.0 están ganando popularidad, algunos profesionales sanitarios se resisten a utilizarlas. De hecho, más de la mitad de los farmacéuticos entrevistados manifestaba un nulo conocimiento de las herramientas de la Web 2.0. Sería positivo que los farmacéuticos las usasen adecuadamente durante su práctica profesional para sacarles el máximo partido.


Assuntos
Internet , Farmacêuticos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , PubMed , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...